FESTIVAL BLOG

Archive for the ‘Dublin Writers Festival’ Category

Festival Farewell

Sunday, June 6th, 2010

The festival ended with a bang as Gallery Press celebrated their 40th anniversary at The Abbey Theatre with eleven poets and an opening address by Seamus Heaney. With individual readings and music from Bill Whelan, this exclusive poetry encounter is a fitting close to the festival which is also becoming a modern Irish institution.

Unfortunately, it’s time to say goodbye to yet another fantastic Dublin Writers Festival. As well as Dublin City Council and the Arts Council of Ireland, I’d like to say thanks to all the writers, musicians, singer songwriters and festival goers for making this year’s event so spectacular.

I’d also like to give special thanks to Kristi Thompson, lifeisafestival, Caitríona Ní Gháirbhí and Louise Owens for their contributions to this year’s blog.

Until next year, happy reading.

Tom Murphy

Sunday, June 6th, 2010

As Tom Murphy commanded the audience with his gentle manner, intriguing characters and unbelievable modesty, you could immediately see why he is held in such high esteem. An amalgam of life story, readings and discussion about writing, this was an historic event, providing a unique glimpse into the mind of one of Ireland’s most amazing playwrights.

After eight fantastically varied readings, stretching from the comical to the exceedingly dark, Tom answered questions from Conor McPherson and the audience.

Was it easier writing your first few plays?

Yes. You need to enjoy amateur status, before you declare yourself as professional. That’s when the stress hits. In the early days, writing was a therapeutic way to deal with issues such as anger. It was an escape also.

You went from notoriety to a completely different approach. Why was this?

I didn’t want to get typecast. After the success of Whistle in the dark, people had lots of preconceived ideas about me. There was a lot of partying in London at the time and people almost expected me to come in and smash a bottle over their heads. But the violence in that play was emotional, apart from the bottle.”

What was the most important play you wrote?

Famine – it was a public landmark. I expected a wave of plays with the same theme afterwards, but there wasn’t. I was surprised by that.

Was a book easier to write than a play, bearing in mind the crazy world of theatre?

My first instinct is theatre. The book was accidental. I think many playwrights are in the business because syntax and grammar eludes us – it certainly does me. Maybe that’s why we turn to theatre. I realized very young that I wouldn’t be able to emulate the best prose writers. But I’d return to novel writing again.”

Your characters often stretch beyond those of other writers. What do you aim for with your characters?

I aim to satisfy myself. As a writer, there can be lots of different endings, but this is only the case when you don’t know your characters well enough. I want to go beyond and I’m glad that you think my characters do. Sometimes they need the bizarre. I have noticed that the harsher my characters are, the more romantic they are. The cracks show and so does the pain of being gullible. The more romantically realistic my characters are, the harsher it is when the letdown comes.

Yann Martel in conversation with John Boyne

Sunday, June 6th, 2010

It’s never going to be easy if you choose to write about the holocaust. Today’s event was a fantastic meeting of minds as John Boyne conversed with Yann Martel about the machinations, inspiration and philosophy behind his latest book, Beatrice and Virgil. John described the “profound, emotional book” as the most interesting and unusual novel that’s appeared this year.

On writing about the holocaust

Yann reveals that “Henry is a construct, meant to imitate the Jewish lifestyle”. He didn’t want to “write outside of it, because none of us are outside of it”. Yann argues that if we think about or are in dialogue with events such as the holocaust, then we have an automatic involvement. “I wanted the teller of the tale within the tale to be involved – I wanted the event and the character to be in the same room.”

The unusual approach

When addressing the holocaust, historical realism is the approach most commonly used. However, Yann has moved away using allegory or fable as a basis, with animals as central characters. “I thought – what if I use an animal? I can approach the topic using an animal disguise. Then I immediately felt more comfortable” he says. As he points out, “true writers of fiction – those who intend to tell the truth – are quite rare”, going on to applaud the works of John Boyne, David Grossman and Art Spiegelman.

Animals as characters

Yann explained that he liked using animals as characters because they are “veiled in innocence. When they suffer, we feel for them”. Accordingly, animal characters can be used to convey emotion because “there are no preconceived ideas. A tiger can be just a tiger, or a symbol for something, but everyone has preconceived ideas about a dentist”. Animal characters are an excellent medium through which to tell the story, acting as “mirrors which hopefully help us to see our own humanity.”

What is Stephen Harper reading?

For the last few years, Yann has been sending Prime Minister Stephen Harper a novel every fortnight, because “I believe he has not read a book since high school.” Yann strongly believes that part of the role of a Prime Minister is “to dream about creating a better world” and that central to being able to do this is to be “nourished by a muse”. You can read more about this project on his website www.whatisstephenharperreading.ca – a member of the audience is waiting for an Irish writer to follow suit!

Guest blog: John Lynch and Paul Murray

Sunday, June 6th, 2010

A huge thank you to Kristi Thompson for the following post:

Chairman Niall MacMonagle set the tone for this event addressing the dreaded second novel, pointing out that the second house, the second baby, the second car, the second novel– all can be problematic. Kudos to the selection committee for presenting two distinctly different authors. Paul Murray gave a “bawdy humour alert” before his reading of Skippy Dies, presenting the comedic, probing, often daft but entertainingly real mind-set of youth; while John Lynch commanded absolute, rapt silence during his reading from Falling Out of Heaven, a painful portrait of the fallout a man experiences after being raised by a parent with a dark addiction.

Niall: Did either of you have a Harper Lee moment, fearing your first novel might be your last?

John Lynch, known for his work as an actor (Sliding Doors, In the Name of the Father) said he was so caught up in the adventure of writing his first novel, with the intention of hiding it under the bed if it was bad, that he didn’t have time to think of a second novel. Writing, for him, was about definition, defining emotion. It’s where the imagination and emotion meet, putting names to these events.

Niall introduced Paul Murray as someone who writes big books on a big canvas. Skippy Dies, 700 pages, took seven years to complete. Paul said he knew it would take a long time, admitting that when his agent initially signed him for a two-book deal he didn’t have a name let alone an idea for his second book. Paul did have the confidence for this ambitious project, and encouraged all writers to have faith in themselves, and sit down every day to write.

John Lynch dove into his writing from a slightly different angle in that he’s never had a creative writing course. His work as an actor has helped in creating characters and scenarios, saying that as a child he used to enact death scenes for his classmates: “death by poison” or “death by gunshot”. Joseph Campbell’s books gave him a good foundation, as well, ex. Hero With a Thousand Faces.

Niall: Were there any difficulties writing about Seabrook College, which is loosely based on your alma mater Blackrock College?

Paul said he was initially worried, but he wanted to write about what he knows. The Celtic Tiger boom was an important moment in recent history, bringing a kind of aristocratic entitlement, greed, and lack of care for society at large that we hadn’t really seen in Ireland.

John’s inspiration for Falling Out of Heaven was in part from the saying, “We all fall out of the heaven, just that some of us remember the fall.” The novel begins when his protagonist is in an alcohol induced psychosis, believing he is literally falling through the sky. As the story continues his memories build. John shared that he’d had an issue with alcohol and stopped drinking 11 years ago. It was important for him to go into the darkest places along with his protagonist, with graphic honesty, but to leave a “trail of bread crumbs, to find my way back out”.

Many thanks to Paul Murray and John Lynch– for showing us the places you go in your writing.

Guest blog post by Kristi Thompson

John Lynch and Paul Murray.

Chairman Niall MacMonagle set the tone for this event addressing the dreaded second novel, pointing out that the second house, the second baby, the second car, the second novel– all can be problematic. Kudos to the selection committee for presenting two distinctly different authors. Paul Murray gave a “bawdy humour alert” before his reading of Skippy Dies, presenting the comedic, probing, often daft but entertainingly real mind-set of youth; while John Lynch commanded absolute, rapt silence during his reading from Falling Out of Heaven, a painful portrait of the fallout a man experiences after being raised by a parent with a dark addiction.

Did either of you have a Harper Lee moment, fearing your first novel might be your last? John Lynch, known for his work as an actor (Sliding Doors, In the Name of the Father) said he was so caught up in the adventure of writing his first novel, with the intention of hiding it under the bed if it was bad, that he didn’t have time to think of a second novel. Writing, for him, was about definition, defining emotion. It’s where the imagination and emotion meet, putting names to these events.

Niall introduced Paul Murray as someone who writes big books on a big canvas. Skippy Dies, 700 pages, took seven years to complete. Paul said he knew it would take a long time, admitting that when his agent initially signed him for a two-book deal he didn’t have a name let alone an idea for his second book. Paul did have the confidence for this ambitious project, and encouraged all writers to have faith in themselves, and sit down every day to write.

John Lynch dove into his writing from a slightly different angle in that he’s never had a creative writing course. His work as an actor has helped in creating characters and scenarios, saying that as a child he used to enact death scenes for his classmates: “death by poison” or “death by gunshot”. Joseph Campbell’s books gave him a good foundation, as well, ex. Hero With a Thousand Faces.

Were there any difficulties writing about Seabrook College, which is loosely based on your alma mater Blackrock College? Paul said he was initially worried, but he wanted to write about what he knows. The Celtic Tiger boom was an important moment in recent history, bringing a kind of aristocratic entitlement, greed, and lack of care for society at large that we hadn’t really seen in Ireland.

John’s inspiration for Falling Out of Heaven was in part from the saying, “We all fall out of the heaven, just that some of us remember the fall.” The novel begins when his protagonist is in an alcohol induced psychosis, believing he is literally falling through the sky. As the story continues his memories build. John shared that he’d had an issue with alcohol and stopped drinking 11 years ago. It was important for him to go into the darkest places along with his protagonist, with graphic honesty, but to leave a “trail of bread crumbs, to find my way back out”.

Many thanks to Paul Murray and John Lynch– for showing us the places you go in your writing.

Guest Blog: The Riverrun Project

Sunday, June 6th, 2010

I was pleased to see that the festival had included several Irish language events this year and I was delighted to receive the following review of The Riverrun Project by Caitríona Ní Gháirbhí.

I was in a state of delirium last evening and still am at the stunning presentation by IMRAM, on stage at The Sugar Club.  First, I want to say how wonderfully kind and thoughtful the staff were to me (I had a physical difficulty).  Then the poetry, music and visual input were outstanding.  I am familiar with the work of the poets present but the music composed and played by Séan Óg was spectacular – it had the effect of the first River Dance on me.  The playing of Ag Críost an Síol was sensational, with ornamentation, echo effects and superb skill. I was also so fortunate to meet Biddy Jenkinson in person and to hear that epic poem abot Seán Ó Neachtain and old Dublin. Now I have run out of words!  Míle, míle buíochas don oíche shonntasach seo

Slán,
Críona

Thank you so much to Caitríona Ní Gháirbhí for this blog post.

Guest blog: Natasha Walter & Susan McKay

Saturday, June 5th, 2010

Many thanks to Louise Owens for the following post:  

The robust and intelligent dialogue this evening with Natasha Walter and Susan McKay was both inspiring and thought-provoking.  After a comic introduction by Chairwoman Anthea McTiernan, which earned enthusiastic laughter from a packed audience, Natasha read a exerpt from her book, Living Dolls: The Return of Sexism.

It has been over 10 years since Natasha wrote ‘The New Feminism”, and the lack of progress and enlightenment in society since the late nineties, coupled with raising a young daughter, has prompted Natasha to write a second book.  Living Dolls delves into issues of the sex trade, sterotypes and women’s choices.

In today’s discussion, Natasha read an exerpt from her book which details the startling realities relating to the objectification of women in today’s society.  She graphically describes a scene in a nightclub where she witnessed women, with trepidation, ‘trying out’ to earn a place as a glamour model  in a mens magazine.  The more pornographical tantilising the woman, the greater their success in the eyes of their foul mouthed, sexually potent onlookers.

It was an engaging start to the discussion, and although the eagar audience were charged to participate, they waited patiently as Susan McKay took to the podium.  They were not disappointed, as Susan tackled issues such as women in politics, women as ‘enablers’, young women and feminism, and the dissent of sexism in today’s society vis-a-vis feminism movements in previous decades.

Susan also highlighted the challenges of feminism as it is perceived in the media today, where feminism is a marketing tool for companies to sell their products and generate sustained exposure in the media.

The audience were energetic and informed in the discussion that followed, with some challenging thoughts put forward.   In all, Natasha, Susan and Anthea left the audience wanting more, which is always a good place to leave them!

Guest blog post by Louise Owens.

Guest blog: Jennifer Johnston

Saturday, June 5th, 2010

Unfortunately, I couldn´t make it to the Jennifer Johnston event on Friday. So a huge thank you to lifeisafestival for the following post:

When Jennifer Johnston and Lelia Doolin took to the Dublin Writers Festival stage on Friday night, you could tell that they knew each other well. Doolin joked that the fact they are old friends ‘might make for an interesting conversation as they were bound to disagree over a few things.’ She was definitely right, as the evening proved to be an enlightening insight into the process of novel writing.

The event concentrated on Johnston’s book ‘The Illusionist‘, which she herself thought of as ‘actually, excuse me, quite well written.’ Listening to Johnston read a number of excerpts from her novel, it became obvious why she has been called one of Ireland’s finest authors by so many critics. Her writing is full of beautiful imagery and there is a great rhythm to her prose.

Prompted by Doolin, Johnston explained that at the time of writing the book she was living away from Dublin, away from family and friends. Feeling very isolated, the writing process was therapeutic. It helped her to face her own demons: ‘I just started writing the book and it started to grow like a plant growing. The Illusionist was a sort of medecine book for me, it cured me,’ she says.

The novel, a story of two interlinked narratives with a limited cast of characters, deals with a complex family relationship. The themes Johnson explores tend to be, naturally, close to her own heart, but not necessarily autobiographical. In this book, the female protagonist, Stella, reflects on her role as a mother and a writer.

Doolin suggested that Martyn, the male protagonist is a ‘nasty piece of work, a bully‘ and their daughter Robin more or less a replica of him. So, are there any parallels to her own life? Her own family, Johnston replies, is ‘large and fairly eccentric, they all have their own stories to tell and I have used some of those in my writing.‘ The characters are not modelled on anyone in particular, however, because ‘if I was to put them all into one book it would be “War and Peace“,’ she jokes.

At the end of the reading Johnston took questions from the audience including who her favourite writers were (McGahern and Chekhov topped her shortlist) and what she thought of screen adapations of her books (the latest one being ‘Two Moons’, the screenplay of which was recently written by actor Gabriel Byrne).

One sentence that stuck with me from the last excerpt Johnston read from ‘The Illusionist‘ is ‘Tomorrow is another day, perhaps even another life‘, which goes to show that despite the serious subject matter of the novel, Johnson’s prose is not pessmistic . On the contrary, her down-to-earth sense of humour and the visual, almost theatrical aspects of her writing shine through on every page. Naturally, the signing queue after the event was a long and appreciative one as the momentousness of the occasion was not lost on anyone who attended the reading.

blog post written by lifeisafestival

David Mitchell shows the inner workings of a writer´s mind

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

Last night’s David Mitchell event was open, honest and funny. Not only were the audience treated to several pages of his latest book “The Thousand Autumns of Jacob De Zoet” (which is stunningly written and I highly recommend), but they were rewarded with a glimpse of the inner workings of a writer’s mind. As chairperson Brendan Barrington stated, the evening was spellbinding.

Throughout his reading, Mitchell interrupted himself to edit his own work. At one point he stopped midsentence; “guard and garden – that doesn’t work very well does it? I’ll have to contact my publishers.” This was a refreshing approach which was not only insightful, but also very much appreciated. I’ve not seen this done before and it’s reassuring to see that even after publication, winning multiple awards and critical acclaim, good writers are still constantly seeking to improve their craft.

It’s also amazing to know that despite receiving many accolades, Mitchell is still daunted by the task of handing over his work. He describes the moment as nerve-wracking. “Every time I hand over my manuscript, apart from the first time when I had no expectations, I think that’s it! My beautiful career has gone! I put a torch to it. the next few days I’m awful to live with. My wife should earn danger money.”


Mitchell was also extremely honest about how his sixth novel was formed, moving from first-person narrative to third person via second person. He admitted that he was struggling to get it right and he was worried as the deadline loomed because each draft required drastic alterations. But he relied on his professionalism, instinct and a few “happy accidents” to get there. But as he says, “The final version is an amalgam of the first two. Nothing goes to waste.

The highlight for me was that Mitchell approached the audience as though it was a group of writers, not just readers. He turned questions back on the audience and wished them good luck with their own books. A member of the audience asked Mitchell for advice for young writers. He offered several practical tips which didn’t mythologize the craft:

  • There’s a myth that the first book has to be amazing, but the first two books you write should be rubbish. They will be awful manuscripts that should be binned. That’s where you make your mistakes.
  • If you’re feeling discouraged, you’re probably doing it right.
  • Keep notebooks and index them well so you don’t spend your life searching through them
  • Cultivate contacts. If an editor gives you feedback, thank them for it and keep their name and the contact open. It’ll be useful later.
  • Remember, it’s not about a marathon. A novel is made up of sections; words, paragraphs, chapters. Instead of looking at a novel like a mammoth task, aim to go to bed having written a beautiful paragraph or having perfected a chapter. And don’t be daunted by the journey ahead, feel proud of the work you’ve done.

I’d like to finish up by thanking David for the interesting “fast sheep on wheels” that he drew in my edition of Number Nine Dream. I’m not sure about the jellyfish he gave to my friend, however – he should have stuck with the cloud which he originally suggested.

Festival starts tomorrow!

Monday, May 31st, 2010

I’m astounded that the festival is just one day away! Unfortunately, I can’t attend very event, but I’ll be going to the following:

It would be lovely to meet some of you, so please ask one of the festival staff to point me out if you’d like to say hi.

Any budding bloggers?

Sunday, May 30th, 2010

The Dublin Writers Festival is a celebration of the beauty, power and magic of language. It’s a rare opportunity to hear from the creative masterminds behind the books that we love, and a chance to share our own experiences with and adoration for the written word.

If there are any budding bloggers out there attending the festival that would like to write up their experience and have have the chance to have it posted on the Dublin Writers Festival blog, please let me know. We’d love to hear about your enjoyment of the festival.

I´m particularly interested in – but not limited to – the events that I can´t attend. You can see a list of where I´ll be tomorrow. Please keep your posts up to a maximum of 300 words. Email your blog post to info@dublinwritersfestival.com and then comment below so I can make sure it doesn’t get missed – the festival is a busy time and I don’t want your efforts to go unnoticed.

And please remember, this is a celebration. I´ll be looking for posts that add to the excitement and spirit of the festival.

Follow us: Facebook Twitter