This event was a real surprise for me. I was amazed at the visible passion, dedication and respect that emanated from Sarah, Ruth and Declan, as they discussed the writers that they’ve brought to life through studies of their literature and lives.
Following the format of readings, discussion and then Q&A with the audience, I was struck by how each of these authors was driven by the desire to make seemingly complex writers more accessible for the modern reader.
I came away intrigued and desperate to get stuck into the pages of these texts. Chairperson Evelyn Conlon summed up the event when she said “the amazing thing about this event is that when you read each book, you’ll be forced to read more.”
Sarah Bakewell on Montaigne:
Sarah discovered Montaigne’s book by accident; it was the only one she could find in English when travelling. Providing a wonderful account of Montaigne’s life, she admitted that his “inventiveness and quirkiness, with an undercurrent of skepticism” compelled her to write about his essays. He “used the world to read himself” and “was aware of his own flaws” she explained. This is certainly something any reader can identify with. One thing that particularly struck me was the opportunity to read about the writers that he read. This gives Sarah’s book an unusually special cyclical quality.
Audience question: “If you hadn’t picked up the Montaigne book at the airport, what would you be doing now?”
Sarah: “That’s a great question. I have no idea. Sometimes things choose people. Making choices and taking paths absentmindedly is one of the great mysteries of life. We should let the world be, rather than theorizing. Montaigne is described as a philosopher, but he wasn’t prescriptive, he just wanted to improve and write about How to live a good life.”
Declan Kiberd on James Joyce:
Declan is well known for his “anonymous celebrity” as the Professor of English at UCD and it was an honour to listen as he gave an insight into Joyce’s life and how it affected his work. He described Ulysses as “a great work of formal audacity and brilliant language, but also on how to live life.” Declan used examples of plot, character, theme and inner dialogue to highlight how Joyce had intended Ulysses to be a book that should be accessible to everyone. He discussed Joyce’s autodidactic approach and his rejection of Bohemia, due to his belief that “art disconnected from life wouldn’t prosper.”
Audience question: Do you think that good fiction is, in fact, truth?
Declan: “Absolutely! Fiction is an absolute immersion in fact. It’s a fictional enactment, scaling reality down to make it credible.”
Ruth Padel on Darwin:
I hadn’t realized that Ruth is in fact the great granddaughter of Darwin – certainly a great motivator for writing about his life. But what amazed me was that she chose to study his life through poetry based on Darwin’s words. This is, I believe, one of the most astoundingly beautiful ideas I’ve heard of for some time. Ruth gave us a wonderful insight into Darwin’s personality, but she also revealed the “role of imagination in how he addressed the world”, bringing this to life with a reading of his reaction to seeing phosphorous on the water for the very first time.
Audience question: Are poetry and science linked?
Ruth: “Poetry and science are closely connected because they have the same aim; to present the world to others. The difference is that scientists never get to the truth because they’re always looking for the next answer.”

